Soros – Clinton’s biggest financial backer. Can Wikileaks sink Hillary?

‘George Soros is Hillary Clinton’s biggest financial backer – email leak that goes underreported.’

Good quick overview by RT of Soros financing Clinton, color revolutions in post-Soviet space, EU refugee crisis and more!

Wikileaks Warns That Coming Material May Sink Clinton Campaign:

In an exclusive interview with Megyn Kelly on the “Kelly File,” Julian Assange, the founder and editor-in-chief, of Wikileaks said there are more Clinton emails coming. He said his team is ‘working around the clock’ on a lot of material and the findings are ‘significant’. “People…have the right to understand who it is they’re electing,” Assange said.

And for desert:

GREAT MINDS THINK ALIKE! ;) The mastermind and main advocate of Brexit Nigel Farage is in the US helping out Donald Trump. Farage has said exactly what I’ve been saying since 2015. To paraphrase: ‘I can’t tell you who to vote for, but I wouldn’t vote for Hillary if they paid me.’ Video (Rus):


Read more in related articles:



Go to 

Support Lada’s FREE articles and reports on FuturisTrendcast:



About Lada Ray

Lada Ray is a linguist & former financial consultant with Smith Barney. Born in Russia, Lada lived and traveled to nearly 30 countries on most continents. She is the internationally certified Feng Shui Master and author of 3 novels + multiple novelettes; most notably, top-rated metaphysical thriller THE EARTH SHIFTER & bestselling thriller GOLD TRAIN (Accidental Spy Russia Adventure). Lada has extensively written re. Russia, world cultures, geopolitics, empire collapse, feng shui and consciousness. She is known for her accurate predictions. Lada's Blogs: FuturisTrendcast - geopolitics and predictions. Lada Ray Blog - books, writing, world cultures. We are presently working on expanding Lada Ray Youtube channel to include Lada's original geopolitical analysis and far-reaching global predictions, as well as her mystical futurism. The world is going through a massive tectonic shift of consciousness on all levels and in all aspects of life. Make sure you are prepared! Subscribe!

Posted on August 27, 2016, in Empire Collapse, Eurasia, Geopolitical Trends, USA/EU/West and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. 21 Comments.

  1. Oh the globalists will cause an ‘accident’ at the Ecuadorian embassy before long.
    The Desperado Gang will stop at nothing to get their (marked) man…

    ASSINATION ATTEMPT? Panic for Julian Assange as intruder scales Ecuadorian embassy wall
    An attempted break-in at the Ecuadorian embassy where WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange is living was foiled this morning.

    ANOTHER DEAD CLINTON CRIMES TRUTH TELLER: WikiLeaks Julian Assange Lawyer FOUND DEAD, After Being Struck by Train

    John Jones was a successful, highly respected attorney at the top of his game who lived in a million dollar home. Jones had no reason to kill himself. Yet, the death is being called a ‘suicide’. Another convenient death of a man who crossed the Clintons and the NWO.

    Liked by 1 person

    • “Oh the globalists will cause an ‘accident’ at the Ecuadorian embassy before long.”

      They already started on it:

      “Ecuador has criticized British police for their slow response to a call reporting that an unknown man was trying to break into at its London embassy, where WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has been living for four years.

      The Ecuadorian government condemned the “inadequate response” of London police, who it claims arrived two hours after the incident took place.”


  2. Soros and his foundation are usually referred to as left wing in the mainstream media ; and in a lot of right wing alternative media too.
    Soros however is right wing; his Open Society operation works to a right wing neoliberal globalist agenda, under left cover.


  3. Is Wikileaks part of a disinformation programme, working for intelligence agencies – an actor in a ‘limited hangout’ operation? Limited hangouts are when intelligence agencies give out some small truths but withhold key and damaging facts of greater importance.

    Julian Assange ‘editor in chief’ of Wikileaks, is supposed to be part of an organization that has inside information on government corruption, yet thinks that 9/11 was not a false flag operation.

    Julian Assange said, “I’m constantly annoyed that people are distracted by false conspiracies such as 9/11, when all around we provide evidence of real conspiracies, for war or mass financial fraud.”

    Julian Assange and Wikileaks support the government’s official 9/11 lie. How can I trust anything they say?

    Liked by 1 person

    • Anybody who thinks 9/11 was not engineered is basically under-educated or not interested. Anybody who promotes 9/11 as a conspiracy theory is an enemy agent. If Assange says 9/11 is a conspiracy I have to do extra research on anything he says. But if he’s got stuff that shows Killery up for who and what she really is, I have to like that. Things have become so complicated. I’d like to know who Assange works for but these guys are so good at what they do… Follow the money doesn’t even work so well anymore at solving mysteries. Cui bono works better, but you have to know their gods and their agenda to make that work.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Where did you hear this?


      • My apologies. I thought your question was directed to “palieohippy” and not to me. The layout of the “Reply” box I mistakenly took to be addressed to “paleohippy”.

        It was a long time ago but I did read from several sources who claimed that Julian Assange and Wikileaks were in fact working for the Establishment. I do not know if this is true or not, but it made me pay attention to the possibility.

        I was trying to locate the sources.

        Here is one I did find. There was a write up by Patrick Henningsen regarding Wikileaks under the title:

        “WIKILEAKS: Corrupted Oracle or Cointelpro Asset of the Establishment?” by Patrick Henningsen of 21st Century Wire.

        Jon Rappoport also considers Edward Snowden to be working for the Establishment:

        “The 36 mysterious days of Edward Snowden” by Jon Rappoport.


      • I was trying to locate one particular source but I have not found it. However, following link,, deals with the issue regarding Wikileaks and 9/11.

        Webster Tarpley in his interview with – dare I say it – Alex Jones,, discusses the hidden agenda behind Wikileaks and the strange cult that Assange was associated with.

        The two links below go into detail of Assange’s strange past and of his connections to an LSD cult with its own psychiatric facility which was connected to Australian intelligence community.

        FT ADMIN: sorry had to delete one link because it results in the entire article making the post way too long. Thanks!

        I have no idea how accurate or reliable the information is.

        My apologies if I have put too many links.


        • Again, sorry – I do not know how that happened where the whole article is printed out – It was meant to be a link!


          • I think we are good. I just replied to you.
            This deserves an article. No promises, but I’ll try to publish a separate piece later in the month. But at least those who subscribe to my comment section will read it.


          • P.S. I know you mean well. But one of the points I am trying to make is to caution everyone not to descend into pure cynicism, when so much around us is corrupt, sensationalist, cynical and sold out.

            It’s a tall order, but we all are responsible for keeping our own souls and hearts pure and out minds clear during these very difficult and confusing times, when conflicting and deliberately convoluted info is coming at us from all ends.

            This is why I write as much as I can on FT and ESRs – to help people orient themselves in this sea of craze.

            Liked by 1 person

        • I see. No problem with the links. We do want to get to the bottom of the truth, don’t we?
          To answer your question, I’m afraid I do not agree with any of that. All this seems purely sensationalist stuff, possibly deliberate hoaxes or truth manipulation, when bloggers knowingly or unknowingly repeat what someone deliberately dumped into cyberspace. I personally never heard of Assange not being credible, or Wikileaks not being credible, from sources I trust. But I’ve seen a terrible Hollywood propaganda movie aimed at discrediting him. You are aware that there is a massive Western campaign against him, aren’t you?

          I am just trying to give you the right truth tools!

          This is for anyone reading this: to make a truly informed decision on anything floating out there, please read my post:
          and ESR1 expanded & reloaded: Is Putin Part of NWO?
          It’s all spelled out in both. What they had attempted to do to Putin in 2014 they are trying to do to Assange. It should be clear that the only way left for them to combat the leaks that topple the NWO agenda is to vilify the source. There’s LOTS more I can add to this – maybe I’ll do an article…

          The best way to really know how much truth is contained in any statement/article is to feel the quality of its energy. Those of us who have a very developed sense of truth and cosmic energy don’t need to do anything special. It just comes to us as pure knowledge. But there is a great tool (or crutch) when in doubt, or if you aren’t that good at the cosmic knowing: you can calibrate based on my Quantum Calibration system.
          So, calibration of the statement that Assange is, say, a CIA or US asset is: 85 (grief). No truth. Each link in your comment calibrates very low as well.

          More about Quantum Calibration system:
          And my latest article with calibration examples re. MSM:

          One can also use common sense and logic. IF Assange is trying to reveal the truth and some very powerful globalist sources don’t want that truth to come out, it is logical to assume they’ll try to either do away with him, and if they can’t, they’ll try to discredit him. Too much is being manipulated now in the alternative media – as much or more than in MSM. Anything on earth and heaven can be manipulated.

          The point is: If Assange is helping to expose Hillary, he is on the right side. Of course he isn’t an angel and he may have skeletons in his closet too. That’s a different story altogether, which is irrelevant and doesn’t negate what he does. The end result is what matters.


          Liked by 1 person

    • FYI all readers: Calibration of the top 9/11-Assange comment by wolf727 is: 85 (grief/despondency) Chi 80 – same. Based on my Quantum Calibrations Scale, therefore, there is no truth in this comment: it is completely off base and well below min. positive calibration of 200.

      More on calibrations:


  4. If you do an article on Julian Assange and Wikileaks, I would be very grateful on any insight or information you may have regarding his stance that people are distracted by false conspiracies such as 9/11.

    I am very baffled and very concerned how Julian Assange who is part of an important organization that has inside information on government corruption would consider AE911Truth and ReThink911 – two highly professional organizations – to be following false conspiracies such as 9/11.

    Former senator Bob Graham – who chaired the United States Senate Select Committee on Intelligence when it performed the Joint Inquiry into 9/11 – gave an interview to the BBC where he said:

    ” I can just state that within 9/11 there are too many secrets, that information that has not been made available to the public for which there are specific tangible credible answers and that that withholding of those secrets has eroded public confidence in their own security… If by conspiracy you mean, more than one person involved, yes, there was more than one person and there was some… collaboration of efforts among agencies and the administration to keep information out of the public’s hands”

    9/11 commissioner Bob Kerry said “It’s a problem… it’s a 30-year-old conspiracy”

    Wikileaks states:

    “Wikileaks is a multi-jurisdictional public service designed to protect whistleblowers, journalists and activists who have sensitive materials to communicate to the public”

    We had whistleblowers like Sibel Edmonds and Daniel Ellsberg who had sensitive materials on 9/11 and cover-ups that “led to the heart of the administration” and yet I am extremely puzzled as to why Wikileaks would ignore these whistleblowers.

    The most important event like 9/11 – that initiated invasions into Afghanistan and Iraq, created the War on Terror ideology, the Patriot Act and NDAA – is considered to be a false conspiracy theory by Wikileaks. If Wikileaks says it is a false conspiracy theory… I guess it must be so.


    • I don’t know, Wolf. As you may have noticed I try not to follow the squabbles (or esp. get involved in them). This is why I stay quietly in my corner of the internet and keep telling the truth I am 500% sure about. Squabbles and fights would only distract me from my mission.

      As to Sibel Edmonds, I already replied to a couple of readers previously: her intel may be solid – I’ll give her that – but only on Turkey and Middle East, where she is from, and US intel is generally in the right direction. But she and her friend Corbett are extreme Russophobes and were both DEAD wrong about everything to do with Ukraine, Putin and Russia. That alone rules them out for me and I am advising people to use discretion. If I allow links people sometimes post for Edmonds, that would be, as I said, because her intel on Turkey/ME may be at times worthwhile. But please don’t make a habit of that!
      Nothing against them personally, but my advice: just be careful who you listen to and concerning what topic, as everyone has their specialties.

      Corbett was one of those who spread the hoax about Putin being NWO agent, and after I dispelled it in ESR1, it all promptly died down. What does that tell us? At a minimum – they are just ignorant, but barge into territories they don’t understand; at a maximum, they just want their 15 min of fame at any cost, even at the cost of telling an outright lie.
      I don’t remember, but didn’t you or someone else quote Fulford as one of the sources for Assange info? And wasn’t Fulford the one who actually started the whole ‘Putin is NWO’ hoax that I had to get involved with dispelling? Sorry if I have the wrong name, but I think that’s him (I try not to concentrate on names, just on the truth).

      There you have it. Perhaps the source of lies and hoaxes lies there? Perhaps you are barking at the wrong tree? Perhaps Wikileaks won’t deal with Edmonds and such due to them understanding as well as I do what they are?

      As I said, nothing personal to anyone. Point is, I have not heard Wiki or Assange saying anything about 9/11. I think it’s not their specialty and they concern themselves with today’s leaks. I can guarantee that their heart is in the right place when it comes to what they are doing today. That’s all I can tell you.

      As to differences of opinion or misunderstandings: they happen even between people doing the same thing, sometimes even brutally. Unfortunately, it’s when ego of certain people gets involved.

      Advice: Best not to get involved in that, but take each truthteller and whistleblower on their merits. They aren’t god or angels. They do things and understand things the way their reality has allowed them to. They have their faults, like all of us do. But they all do a big and dangerous job. Be grateful that they do it so truth could come out.


      • I completely agree with your opinion regarding Sibel Edmonds and James Corbett.

        I have done my own research in the past looking up the views on Sibel Edmonds and James Corbett and I was very disgusted with the unreasonable “rant” coming from Sibel Edmonds against Putin and Russia.

        I only mentioned Sibel Edmonds here strictly regarding her role as a whistleblower on 9/11. I steer completely away from Sibel Edmonds.

        A long time ago I used to follow Sibel Edmonds and James Corbett, but now I refuse to listen to them because of their unreasonable anti-Putin stance.

        Brandon Martinez is another anti-Putin character with whom I engaged with some debates through YouTube comments. And Fulford, he is completely a sham.

        I have followed the speeches of Putin and his political moves in Ukraine and Middle East and so far, I admire the man very much. My personal opinion so far, I consider Putin to be the best statesman this world has seen.

        I think it was me who mentioned Fulford. There was a gang of three Fulford, David Wilcock and Neil Keenan. Many, many, years ago when I embarked upon getting to know the truth, I fell into the trap of following them but later turned away disgusted.

        Getting to know the truth was proving to be a minefield full of imposters and deceivers one calling the other ‘controlled opposition’.

        Through time, research and mistakes I slowly build up a list of journalists and political thinkers whom I feel have integrity and courage in speaking out truth and who seem to be firmly on the ground without going out into realms of fantasy. To name just a few I follow would be Paul Craig Roberts, Eric Zuesse, F. William Engdahl, Michel Chossudovsky, Patrick Henningsen, Vanessa Beeley, Alexander Mercouris and Dmitry Babich.

        My apologies for this length and for taking up your time.


        • Glad you figured it out. But why quote Sibel Edmonds at all then? Doesn’t make sense to me.
          Also, I see I’m not on your list of trusted sources. Yet, how funny: you came here for answers.
          Can only shrug my shoulders at all this.


  5. Note to self regarding my diligent attempts to educate the person who asked the Assange & 9/11 question: don’t waste my valuable time and energy on those who’ll never appreciate it. Never again.

    Liked by 1 person

  1. Pingback: Hillary Clinton is Crazy, Dangerous Conspiracy Theorist! Russians Are Coming! (Watch movie!) | Futurist Trendcast

%d bloggers like this: